Reconstructing Teachers’ Language Intervention for Phonological Aspects in EFL Classroom

Susanto Susanto, Deri Sis Nanda, Wan Irham Ishak

Abstract


Teachers’ language intervention can play a key role in helping students in the classroom interaction to learn a foreign language. In this paper, we discuss the teacher’s language intervention for phonological aspects in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. We used a qualitative descriptive approach with a phenomenological research design. As the data, we recorded the language exchanges between the students and their teachers at the fifth year of a Primary School (Sekolah Dasar) in Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. We categorized three types of teachers’ language intervention, i.e. focalization, correction, and solicitation. Focalization intervention is manifested by the production of a lexical element. The intervention was observed in three situations, namely when reading familiar and unfamiliar English short stories, and playing a game with cards containing English words with their respective pictures, introduced in the stories. The teachers’ language interventions were coded in relation to phonological aspects, i.e. phoneme, syllable, and rhyme. The results show that there are 159 interventions in total. The teachers’ language interventions have the number of speech turns and the duration of the interactions varied in accordance with the context of situation, the Speech-turns mostly occur in reading unfamiliar English stories either for focalization, correction, or solicitation. Thus, this study concluded that teachers intervened more often in reading time of unfamiliar English stories, used focalization more frequently in the intervention, and utilized syllables more preferably as the focus in the intervention. As the implication, variability in the frequency and nature of interventions by the teachers could be at the origin of the differences observed in the performance of students.

Keywords


EFL; Language intervention; Phonological aspects

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Rubaat, A. M., & Alshammari, H. A. (2019). Analysis of phonetic and phonological constraints of Saudi EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 13(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n1p63

Baleghizadeh, S., & Dargahi, Z. (2010). The effect of nursery rhymes on EFL children’s reading ability. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(1), 71–75.

Berman, R. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy, 5(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.5.1.02ber

Bosmans, D., & Hurd, S. (2016). Phonological attainment and foreign language anxiety in distance language learning: A quantitative approach. Distance Education, 37(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1233049

British Council. (2017). Learn english kids free online games, songs, stories and activities for children.

Bryant, P. E., Bradley, L., Maclean, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Nursery rhymes, phonological skills and reading. Journal of Child Language, 16(2), 407–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0426-x

Carroll, J. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Language and phonological skills in children at high risk of reading difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(3), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-7610.2004.00252.X

Chang, C., & Lin, H. C. K. (2019). Classroom interaction and learning anxiety in the IRs-integrated flipped language classrooms. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40299-018-0426-X

Chard, D. J., & Osborn, J. (1999). Phonics and word recognition instruction in early reading programs: Guidelines for accessibility. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1402_4

Chou, M. H. (2014). Assessing English vocabulary and enhancing young English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ motivation through games, songs, and stories. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 42(3), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.680899

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publication, Inc.

Gardner, D. (2004). Vocabulary input through extensive reading: A comparison of words found in children’s narrative and expository reading materials. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.1

Gozcu, E., & Caganaga, C. K. (2016). The importance of using games in EFL classrooms. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(3), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V11I3.625

Graaff, S. De, Bosman, A. M. T., Hasselman, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(4), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430903001308

Hecht, S. A., & Close, L. (2002). Emergent literacy skills and training time uniquely predict variability in responses to phonemic awareness training in disadvantaged kindergartners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00001-2

Høien, T., Lundberg, I., Stanovich, K. E., & Bjaalid, I. K. (1995). Components of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 7(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027184

Huebner, C. E. (2000). Promoting toddlers’ language development through community-based intervention. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(5), 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00052-6

Hummel, K. M., & French, L. M. (2010). Phonological memory and implications for the second language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.3.371

Indrayadi, T. (2021). An analysis of students’ reading comprehension at an islamic institute in Jambi. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(2), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i2.8511

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational Research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kaiser, A. P., & Roberts, M. Y. (2012). Advances in early communication and language intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111429968

Karrass, J., & Rieker, J. M. B. (2005). Effects of shared parent-infant book reading on early language acquisition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPDEV.2004.12.003

LeMonda, C. S. T., & Bornstein, M. H. (2002). Maternal responsiveness and early language acquisition. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 29, 89–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(02)80052-0

Lovett, M. W., De Palma, M., Frijters, J., Steinbach, K., Temple, M., Benson, N., & Lacerenza, L. (2008). Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(4), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408317859

Maclean, M., Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33(3), 255–281.

Mariyam, S. N., & Musfiroh, T. (2019). Total physical response (TPR) method in improving English vocabulary acquisition of 5-6 years old children. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 4(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i2.4071

Mart, C. T. (2012). Encouraging young learners to learn English through stories. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ELT.V5N5P101

Mayo, C., Scobbie, J. M., Hewlett, N., & Waters, D. (2003). The influence of phonemic awareness development on acoustic cue weighting strategies in children’s speech perception. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(5), 1184–1196. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/092)

McMahon, A. (2002). An introduction to English phonology. Edinburgh University Press.

Nanda, D. S., & Susanto, S. (2021). Using drama in EFL classroom for exploring students’ knowledge and learning. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(2), 285–292.

Neugebauer, S., Coyne, M., McCoach, B., & Ware, S. (2017). Teaching beyond the intervention: The contribution of teacher language extensions to vocabulary learning in urban kindergarten classrooms. Reading and Writing, 30(3), 543–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11145-016-9689-X

Olinghouse, N. G., & Wilson, J. (2013). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11145-012-9392-5

Os, M. Van, de Jong, N. H., & Bosker, H. R. (2020). Fluency in dialogue: Turn‐taking behavior shapes perceived fluency in native and nonnative speech. Language Learning, 70(4), 1183–1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/LANG.12416

Oviatt, S., Darves, C., & Coulston, R. (2004). Toward adaptive conversational interfaces: Modeling speech convergence with animated personas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(3), 300–328. https://doi.org/10.1145/1017494.1017498

Riordan, J., Reese, E., Rouse, S., & Schaughency, E. (2018). Promoting code-focused talk: The rhyme and reason for why book style matters. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 45, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECRESQ.2018.05.004

Sayakhan, N. I., & Bradley, D. H. (2019). A nursery rhymes as a vehicle for teaching English as a foreign language. Journal of University of Raparin, 6(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.26750/paper

Schmid, E. C. (2010). Developing competencies for using the interactive whiteboard to implement communicative language teaching in the English as a Foreign Language classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.491218

Schuele, C. M., & Boudreau, D. (2008). Phonological awareness intervention: Beyond the basics. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/002)

Silvén, M., Niemi, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2002). Do maternal interaction and early language predict phonological awareness in 3-to 4-year-olds? Cognitive Development, 17(1), 1133–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00093-X

Smith, A. K. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT Press.

Snowling, M., & Hulme, C. (1994). The development of phonological skills. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 346(1315), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTB.1994.0124

Susanto, S. (2016). A case study of prosodic phrasal grouping and intonational prominence in language acquisition. English Review: Journal of English Education, 4(2), 289–295.

Thakur, V. S. (2020). Phonological problems of Omani EFL learners: Pedagogical perspectives and implications. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.3

Viera, R. T. (2017). Vocabulary knowledge in the production of written texts: a case study on EFL language learners. Revista Tecnológica-ESPOL, 30(3), 89–105.

Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S., DePaolis, R. A., & Hallé, P. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(3), 336–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.11.004

Vonkova, H., Jones, J., Moore, A., Altinkalp, I., & Selcuk, H. (2021). A review of recent research in EFL motivation: Research trends, emerging methodologies, and diversity of researched populations. System, 103, 102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2021.102622

Weiss, A. L. (1993). Planning language intervention for young children. In D. Bernstein & E. Tiegerman (Eds.), Language and Communication Disorders in Children (3rd ed., p. 231). Merrill.

Yang, Q. F., Chang, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Zou, D. (2020). Balancing cognitive complexity and gaming level: Effects of a cognitive complexity-based competition game on EFL students’ English vocabulary learning performance, anxiety and behaviors. Computers & Education, 148, 103808. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2020.103808




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v7i2.12309

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License

Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensep-ISSN 2301-7562e-ISSN 2579-7964