The Integrated E-LKPD Development with SQ4R Learning Strategy to Train Students’ Metacognition Ability

Nisa Nur Hasna, Novi Ratna Dewi

Abstract


This research is stimulated by the low metacognitive ability of students in Indonesia. The real impact of students' low metacognitive ability is that they are unable to monitor themselves and do not know the nature of their learning goals. The use of the integrated E-LKPD (e-worksheet) with SQ4R learning strategies (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Reflect, Review) has the potential to be an alternative choice to train students' metacognitive ability. This study aims to determine the validity of the product, and product characteristics as well as to train the metacognition ability’s profile of each student. This type of research is development research with the 4D model development. The integrated E-LKPD with SQ4R strategy has the characteristics; integrated with SQ4R strategy, train metacognitive abilities, attractive E-LKPD, flexible E-LKPD, interactive E-LKPD, and E-LKPD includes general requirements for LKPD. The results of the study prove that the integrated E-LKPD with the SQ4R strategy is valid with an average V index of 0.95 in the material aspect and 0.94 in the media aspect with the V table of 0.87. The results of the MAI questionnaire obtain a metacognitive profile of 85.25 with well-developed metacognition criteria. Thus, the developed E-LKPD has been tested to be valid and, therefore, can be used to train students' metacognitive ability.

Keywords


Development research; E-LKPD SQ4R; Metacognition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, M. A. K. B. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). A collaborative learning intervention module to improve speaking fluency. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 1834–1838.

Amal, M. F., & Mahmudi, A. (2020). Enhancing students’ self-efficacy through metacognitive strategies in learning mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1), 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012061

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261

Amnah, S. (2014). Profil kesadaran dan strategi metakognisi mahasiswa baru pendidikan biologi fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan Universitas Islam Riau Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 22–27.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Astiningsih, A. D., & Partana, C. F. (2020). Using android media for chemistry learning construction of motivation and metacognition ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13119a

Aswadi, R., Fadiawati, N., & Abdurrahman. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan metakognisi siswa pada pembelajaran fisika menggunakan lembar kerja siswa berbasis inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(1), 43–54.

Bakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. (2020). Mathematical instructional: A conceptual of redesign of active learning with metacognitive regulation strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13343a

Başar Assoc, M., & Gürbüz, M. (2017). Effect of the SQ4R technique on the reading comprehension of elementary school 4th grade elementary school students. In International Journal of Instruction (Vol. 10, Issue 2).

Darmojo, H., & Kaligis, enny R. . (1993). Pendidikan IPA 2. Debdikbud.

Dewi, N. P. V. F., Ganing, N. N., & Negara, I. G. A. O. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran survey, question, read, recite, review, reflect berbantuan media teks cerita rakyat terhadap kompetensi membaca pemahaman mata pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. International Journal of Elementary Education, 3(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v3i3.19403

Dewi, N R, Listiaji, P., Savitri, E. N., & Yanitama, A. (2021). Testing on a diagnostic test-based science metacognition assessment tool using moodle. Unnes Science Education Journal, 10(3), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v10i3.52015

Dewi, Novi Ratna, & Akhlis, I. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran IPA berbasis pendidikan multikultural menggunakan permainan untuk mengembangkan karakter siswa. Unnes Science Education Journal, 5(1), 1098–1108.

Dewi, Novi Ratna, Wibowo, W. A., Savitri, E. N., & Dewi, N. R. (2017). The analysis of science learning sources reviewed from the metacognitive ability of the vii grade the students of SMP Negeri 2 Boja. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(2), 1635–1641.

Díaz, J., Muñoz, D., Muñoz, J., Ibáñez, S. J., & Martínez, V. G. (2021). Design and validation of an observational instrument for final actions in Padel. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de La Actividad Fisica y Del Deporte, 21(81), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.15366/RIMCAFD2021.81.013

Emzir, A. D. (2011). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Rajawali Pers.

Fauzi, A., Rahmatih, A. N., Indraswati, D., & Sobri, M. (2021). Penggunaan situs liveworksheets untuk mengembangkan LKPD interaktif di sekolah dasar. Mitra Mahajana: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(3), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.37478/mahajana.v2i3.1277

Fitriani, O., & Suhardi, S. (2019). The effectiveness of PQ4R (preview, question, read, reflect, recite, review) in reading comprehension skill. 6th International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation (ICERI 2018), 523–526. https://doi.org/10.2991/iceri-18.2019.52

Hardiyanti, W., Hidayati, Y., Puspita Hadi, W., & Rosidi, I. (2021). Pengaruh penggunaan diagram roundhouse terhadap keterampilan metakognisi siswa. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v11i1.119

Herwanis, D., Zakaria, R., Renaldi, A., & Sari, I. (2021). The comparison between Sq5R and fix–up strategy in reading comprehension for EFL secondary level learners. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(3), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i3.3845

Heyes, C., Bang, D., Shea, N., Frith, C. D., & Fleming, S. M. (2020). Knowing ourselves together: The cultural origins of metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.007

Hidayah, A. N., Hariati Winingsih, P., & Fitri Amalia, A. (2020). Development of physics e-LKPD (electronic worksheets) using 3d pageflip based on problem based learning on balancing and rotation dynamics. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 36–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30738/cjipf.v7i2.9091

Hidayanti, R., Sowiyah, S., & Pargito, P. (2017). Pengembangan lembar kegiatan peserta didik (LKPD) berbasis inkuiri terbimbing. Pedagogi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(12), 1–11.

Hikmawati, V. Y., Rustaman, N. Y., & Saefudin, S. (2014). Efektivitas SQ5R terhadap pengetahuan konseptual dan retensi siswa SMA pada pembelajaran sistem reproduksi manusia. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 19(2), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v19i2.461

Junina, I., Halim, A., & Mahidin. (2020). The effect of discovery learning-based worksheet on students’ metacognition skill and learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012100. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012100

Karatas, K., & Arpaci, I. (2021). The role of self-directed learning, metacognition, and 21st century skills predicting the readiness for online learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10786

KBBI. (2016). KBBI.

Keibler, V. (2013). Are students ready to be the creatives we need? finding an emergent theory for student original thinking using metacognitive awareness. In Robert Morris University. Robert Morris University.

Khusniyah, N. L., & Lustyantie, N. (2017). Improving english reading comprehension ability through survey, questions, read, record, recite, review strategy (SQ4R). English Language Teaching, 10(12), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p202

Ku, K. Y. L., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6

Laar, E. van, van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176

Larasati, S. V., Rais, A. D., & Elyono, D. (2018). Improving students’ reading comprehension by using survey, question, read, recite, and review (SQ3R) method. English Education, 6(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.20961/eed.v6i2.35952

Lestari, W., Fatinatus, S., & Layliyyah, R. (2019). Pendekatan open-ended terhadap kemampuan metakognitif siswa. At-Ta’lim: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36835/attalim.v5i2.263

Maskur, R., Sumarno, Rahmawati, Y., Pradana, K., Syazali, M., Septian, A., & Palupi, E. K. (2020). The effectiveness of problem based learning and aptitude treatment interaction in improving mathematical creative thinking skills on curriculum 2013. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.375

Maulida, N., Anra, H., & Pratiwi, H. S. (2018). Aplikasi pembelajaran interaktif pengenalan hewan pada anak usia dini. Jurnal Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi (JustIN), 6(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v6i1.23726

Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763

Nemeth, E., & Bibok, K. (2022). Pragmatics and the flexibility of word meaning. In Pragmatics and the Flexibility of Word Meaning. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585474267

Permana, F. H., & Chamisijatin, L. (2019). Project-based learning through edmodo: Improving critical thinking and histology concepts. Biosfer, 12(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n1.58-69

Praherdhiono, H., Adi, E. P., & Devita, R. N. (2018). Understanding of digital learning sources with the heutagogy approach using the k-means and naive bayes methods. 4th International Conference on Education and Technology, ICET 2018, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEAT.2018.8693929

Rahayu, S., Zulianto, S., & Nur, Y. (2019). Penerapan strategi SQ4R dalam meningkatkan kemampuan membaca pemahaman siswa kelas IV SDN I Bolano Kabupaten Parigi Motong. Bahasantodea, 5(4), 77–87.

Reyna, J., Hanham, J., & Meier, P. (2018). The Internet explosion, digital media principles and implications to communicate effectively in the digital space. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018754361

Rojabi, A. R. (2020). Exploiting SQ4R cooperative learning method to enhance efl students’ reading comprehension. Edulingua: Jurnal Linguistiks Terapan Dan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.34001/edulingua.v7i1.1160

Safaruddin, S., Nurhastuti, N., Fatmawati, F., Silitonga, E. C., & Z, M. (2018). Efektivitas metode survey, question, read, recite, reflect, review (SQ4R) dalam meningkatkan keterampilan membaca pemahaman untuk anak berkesulitan belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Kebutuhan Khusus, 2(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.24036/jpkk.v2i2.315

Saputra, N., Nugroho, R., Aisyah, H., & Karneli, O. (2021). Digital skill during covid-19: Effects of digital leadership and digital collaboration. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 19(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2021.019.02.04

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Septina, E. P., Marianti, A., & Widiatningrum, T. (2018). The use of science reflective journal writing by jas approach to train students metacognitive ability. Journal of Biology Education, 7(3), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.15294/jbe.v7i3.24260

Suardani, N. M., Marhaeni, I. N., & Lasmawan, I. W. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw terhadap hasil belajar IPS dengan kovariabel motivasi berprestasi pada siswa kelas V SDN 1 Semarapura Tengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Ganesha, 3(1), 1–9.

Sukowati, D., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. (2016). Analisis kemampuan literasi sains dan metakogntif peserta didik. Physics Communication, 1(1), 16–22.

Thiagarajan, Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. Indiana University.

Ummayah, F. F. D., & Dewi, N. R. (2021). Analysis of students metacognition ability through problem based learning assisted by worksheets on environmental pollution material. Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 1(2), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.15294/jese.v1i2.45773

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

Warsita, B. (2008). Teknologi pembelajaran landasan dan aplikasinya. Rineka Cipta.

Worrell, B., Brand, C., & Repenning, A. (2015). Collaboration and computational thinking: A classroom structure. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, VL/HCC, 2015, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2015.7357215

Yanti, H., Distrik, I. W., & Rosidin, U. (2019). The effectiveness of students’ worksheets based on multi-representation in improving students’ metacognition skills in static electricity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012083




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v7i2.11226

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License

Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. p-ISSN 2301-7562 | e-ISSN 2579-7964