Mustofa Azami’s Criticism of Joseph Schacht’s Thoughts on Hadits

Ahmad Isnaeni, Moh. Mukri, Masrukhin Muhsin, Is Susanto

Abstract


Joseph Shacht a theory developer of the origin of hadits developed by Goldziher. The study of sanad has become a central topic that has received more attention. Some of the theories developed by Schacht lead to doubts about the authenticity of the hadits sanad. Sanad is only made by people who lived later and then leaned on to an authoritative figure to seek its legality. The results of this scientific work received criticism from Azami by bringing other evidence to rely on. The claim to the correctness of Schacht's theory is then considered not objective in terms of scientific truth standards. Some of the problems above are the focus of the study in this study, based on critical analysis methods and historical approaches. The result of the research is that the Sunnah is an expression, habit and way of life even though at that time the habits agreed by the community then relied on the Prophet. The more complete the series of sanads, as an indication, the further away from the Prophet's life. Sanad as a basis for dating a hadits. Even the appearance of sanad was earlier than the hadits editorial. Schacht based the development of the hadits sanad study through the theory of back projection and common link. Azami's criticism of Schacht's theory is as a baseless scientific lie. These theories stand on some of Schacht's misunderstanding of the theory and terms formulated by hadits scholars. Schacht's theory of the Sunnah also contradicts the historical realities prevailing in the early Islamic world.

Keywords


Mustofa Azami; Joseph Schacht; Hadits; Authenticity; Sanad

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amin, Kamaruddin. Isnad and The Historicity of Hadits. Jakarta: Pustaka Mapan, 2008.

As-Siba’i, Mustafa. As-Sunnah Wa Makanatuhafi at-Tasyri Al-Islami. Beirut: Al-Makhtab al-Islami, 1998.

Asy-Syafi’i, Muhammad ibn Idris. Ar-Risalah. Edited by Ahmad Muhammad Syakir. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1309.

Azami, MM. Dirāsāt Fī Al-Ḥadīṡ an-Nabawi Wa Tārīkh Tadwīnih. Beirut: Al-Makhtab al-Islami, 1985.

———. On Schacht’s Origin of Muḥammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.

———. Pembelaan Eksistensi Hadis. Ke 1. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2002.

———. Studies In Early Hadits Literature With A Critical Edition of Some Early Tekts. Beirut: Al-Makhtab al-Islami, 1968.

Berg, Herbert. The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from the Formative Period. The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from the Formative Period, 2013.

Darussamin, Zikri. “Studi Atas Pemikiran Ignaz Goldziher Tentang Hadis.” UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 1997.

Goldziher, Ignaz. Muslim Studies. Muslim Studies, 2017.

Maliki, Maliki, and Husnul Hidayati. “Pemikiran Hadits Kamarudin Amin”.el-’Umdah (2019).

Masrur, Ali. “Asal Usul Hadis, Telaah Atas Teori Common Link GHA Juynboll.” UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2004.

———. Teori Commonk Link GHA Juynboll, Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadits Nabi. Cetakan Ke. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2007.

Minhaji, Akhmad. Kontroversi Pembentukan Hukum Islam: Kontribusi Joseph Schacht. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2001.

Motzki, Harald. The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence Meccan Fiqh before the Classical Schools. Edited by Marion H Katz. Leiden: Brill, 2002.

Munandar, Munandar. “Sanggahan Atas Teori Ingkar As-Sunnah Joseph Schacht.” Shahih: Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam (2017).

Nasution, Harun. Tradisi Baru Penelitian Agama Islam, Tinjauan Antar Disiplin Ilmu. Bandung: Pusjarlit & Nuansa, 1998.

Nugroho, Irzak Yuliardy. “Orientalisme Dan Hadits : Kritik Terhadap Sanad Menurut Pemikiran Joseph Schacht.” Jurnal Hukum Islam (2020).

Rahmatullah, Lutfi. “Otentisitas Hadis Dalam Perspektif Harald Motzki.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 7, no. 1 (2006): 68–71.

Riady, Fahmi. “Asal Usul Hadis Menurut Herber Berg.” Yogyakarta, 2007.

Rom, Cd. “Al-Maktabah Asy-Syamikah.” Beirut: Musthafa al-Babi al-Halabi, 1999.

Schacht, Joseph. An Introduction to Islimic Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.

———. Pengantar Hukum Islam. Edited by Derta Sri Widowati. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia, 2010.

———. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. London: Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1971.

Suadi, Hasan. “Menyoal Kritik Sanad Joseph Schacht.” Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis (2017).

Supian, Aan. “Studi Hadis Di Kalangan Orientalisme.” Nuansa (2016).

Suwarno, Rahmadi Wibowo. “Kesejarahan Hadis Dalam Tinjauan Teori Common Link.” Jurnal Living Hadis (2018).

Syarifah, Umayyah. “Kontribusi Muhammad Musthafa Azami dalam Pemikiran Hadis (Counter Atas Kritik Orientalis)” Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam (2015).

Yakub, Ali Mustafa. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2000.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/klm.v15i1.8680

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2021 KALAM

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

KALAM [ISSN: 0853-9510, e-ISSN: 2540-7759] published by Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Study, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung in collaboration with Asosiasi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam (Islamic Theology and Philosophy Association)

Office: Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Study, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung. Letkol H. Endro Suratmin Street, Sukarame, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia, Postal code 34513. Website: http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/kalam, Email: [email protected].

Creative Commons License This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.