The Use of Vlog in Improving Students’ Oral Language Production: A Case Study
Abstract
References
Afshari, M., Ghavifekr, S., Siraj, S., & Jing, D. (2013). Students’ Attitudes towards Computer-assisted Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 852–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.407
Ahluwalia, G., Sahib, F., Aggarwal, D., & Sahib, F. (2010). Language Learning With Internet-Based Project : A Student-Centered Approach For Engineering Students. ESP World, 9(1), 1–12.
Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329
Anil, B. (2016a). A study on developing speaking skills through techno-driven tasks. Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 7(1), 80–93.
Anil, B. (2016b). Top-Up Students Second Language Talk Time through Vlogs. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.v1i2.9
Azar, A. S., & Nasiri, H. (2014). Learners’ Attitudes toward the Effectiveness of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in L2 Listening Comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1836–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.613
Balakrishnan, V. D., & Puteh, F. (2014). Blending Face-to-Face Communication and Video Blogging in Acquiring Public Speaking Skills. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 2(1), 64–72.
Balakrishnan, V., & Gan, C. L. (2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.004
Bygate, M. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00048-7
Celik, C. (2014). Vlogues sur YouTube : un nouveau genre d’interactions multimodales, 265–280. Retrieved from https://impec.sciencesconf.org/conference/impec/pages/Impec2014_Combe_Celik.pdf
Chun, D., Smith, B., & Kern, R. (2016). Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning. Modern Language Journal, 100, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302
Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning: Original Articles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00865.x
Combe, C., & Codreanu, T. (2016). Vlogging: a new channel for language learning and intercultural exchanges. In P. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley, & S. Thouesney (Eds.), CALL communities and culture - short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 119–124). https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.EUROCALL2016.9781908416445
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008391
Davies, N. F. (1980). Language acquisition, language learning and the school curriculum. System, 8(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(80)90035-4
De Jong, N. H., Groenhout, R., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000210
Demouy, V., & Hulme, A. K. (2010). Open Learning : The Journal of Open , Distance and e-Learning On the spot : using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning, 25(3), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2010.511955
DeWitt, D., Naimie, Z., & Siraj, S. (2013). Technology Applications Used by First Year Undergraduates in a Malaysian Public University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 937–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.416
Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: style shifting in the use of the past tense. St, 9, 12–20.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The Effects of Task Repetition on Linguistic Output. Language Learning, 49(4), 549–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00102
Gonzalez-Acevedo, N. (2016). Technology-enhanced-gadgets in the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language to Very Young Learners. Ideas on Implementation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.070
Grgurović, M., Chapelle, C. A., & Shelley, M. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25(2), 165–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000013
Gündüz, N. (2005). Computer Assisted Language Learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.24391
Hashemi, M., & Aziznezhad, M. (2011). Computer assisted language learning freedom or submission to machines? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 832–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.152
Hulstijn, J. H., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical Errors As a Function of Processing Constraints and Explicit Knowledge. Language Learning, 34(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00994.x
Hung, S. T. (2011). Pedagogical applications of Vlogs: An investigation into ESP learners perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01086.x
James, R. (1996). CALL And The Speaking Skill. System, 24(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00050-T
Johnson, M. D. (2017). Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37(August 2016), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12057.x
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2003). Effects of Feedback on Performance: A Study of Advanced Learners on an ESP Speaking Course.Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/62227676?accountid=12528 LA - English
Mackey, A. (2007). Feedback in Child ESL Classrooms. Tesol Quarterly, 41(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00060.x
Mehnert, U. (1998). The Effects of Different Lenghts of Time For Planning On Second Language Performence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198001041
Moradi, Z., & Talebi, S. H. (2014). The Effect of Pre-speaking Strategies Instruction in Strategic Planning on Iranian EFL Students’ Awareness as well as Students’ Fluency and Lexical Resources in Speaking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.537
Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and Focus on Form in L2 Oral Performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(01), 109–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199001047
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder.
Oz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Digital Device Ownership, Computer Literacy, And Attitudes Toward Foreign And Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.028
Parmaxi, A., Zaphiris, P., & Ioannou, A. (2016). Enacting artifact-based activities for social technologies in language learning using a design-based research approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 556–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.072
Révész, A. (2011). Task Complexity, Focus on L2 Constructions, and Individual Differences: A Classroom-Based Study. Modern Language Journal, 95, 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01241.x
Rossiter, M. J., Derwing, T. M., Manimtim, L. G., & Thomson, R. I. (2010). Oral Fluency: The Neglected Component in the Communicative Language Classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(4), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.4.583
Ru-Chu Shih, V. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1048
Said, E. (2014). Covering Islam. Muscle & Nerve, 49, iii–iv. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24009
Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00096
Skehan, P. (2003). Review article Task-based instruction. Language And Technology, 36, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302
Smith, D., & Maté, N. (2010). Personalizing the abstract with online video watching a documentar. Canadian Education Assosiation, 46(2), 50–52.
Stickler, U., & Shi, L. (2016). TELL us about CALL: An introduction to the Virtual Special Issue (VSI) on the development of technology enhanced and computer assisted language learning published in the System Journal. System, 56, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.12.004
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers and Education, 94(11), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001
Tal, M., & Yelenevskaya, M. (2012). Computer-assisted Language Learning: Challenges in Teaching Multilingual and Multicultural Student Populations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(Graham 2006), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.649
Tarighat, S., & Khodabakhsh, S. (2016). Mobile-Assisted Language Assessment: Assessing speaking. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.014
Thomson, D. L. (2010). Beyond The Classroom Walls: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on How Online Learning Can Meet the Needs of Gifted Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 662–712.
Watkins, J., & Wilkins, M. (2011). Using YouTube in the EFL Classroom. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/11/V2/I1/A09/Watkins_Wilkins
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The Effects of Pre-Task Planning and On-Line Planning on Fluency, Complexity and Accuracy in L2 Monologic Oral Production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27+372+374. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1
Zamari, Z. M., Adnan, A. H. M., Idris, S. L., & Yusof, J. (2012). Students’ Perception of using Online Language Learning Materials. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67(November 2011), 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.367
DOI: 10.24042/ee-jtbi.v13i1.5298
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0